Book
Reviews
The Church at the End of
the 20th Century by Francis Schaeffer
One of the finest Christian writers of the
20th century, Schaeffer engages the heart and the mind. A
keen commentator on current cultural and philosophical trends,
Schaeffer describes the failings of the modern church and
what the church must do to survive.
excerpts
Chapter 1: The Roots of the Student Revolution
- Atheistic thinking has led to its logical conclusion; a lack
of meaning and value in any and everything.
Galileo, Copernicus, Francis Bacon, and Kepler
and scientists up to and including Newton believed that the
world was created by a reasonable God and therefore we could
find out the order of the universe by reason. (9)
"Man by the Fall fell at the same time
from his state of innocence and from his dominion over nature.
Both of these losses, however, can even in this life be in
some part repaired; the former by religion and faith, the
latter by the arts and the sciences." - Francis Bacon
(9)
The difficulty with modern theology is that
it is no different from taking drugs. It is one trip or another.
You may try LSD, you can try the modern theology. It makes
no difference - both are trips, separated from reason.
What we are left with is God-words. Students
coming out of all kinds of backgrounds are saying, "I'm
sick of God-words." And I must respond, "So am I."
These theologians have cut themselves off from any concept
of prepositional, verbalized revelation in the Bible. They
are left upstairs with only connotation words and no content.
There are four ways that evangelicals have
tended to drift unknowingly in this same direction: (1) by
saying, "Don't ask questions; just believe," (2)
by decreasing the content of their preaching and teaching
until at times the modern man hears their message as, "Drop
out and take a trip with Jesus," (3) by praising Karl
Barth without realizing that he opened the door to the whole
of the theology of the leap and (4) by applying to the early
chapters of Genesis the same approach that Barth did to the
whole Bible; that is, by separating the Bible's statements
in regard to space-time history from 'religious truth'. (21)
Chapter 2: The International Student Revolution
- The lack of absolutes will inevitably lead to the destruction
of anything which is not part of the majority opinion. A Christian
revolution is necessary in which we must take into account
1) the difference between cobelligerent and ally, 2) the preaching
and practice of the truth even at great cost in our Christian
groups and 3) the observation of true community.
The danger is that the evangelical, being
so committed to middle-class norms and often even elevating
these norms to an equal pace with God's absolutes, will slide
without thought into accepting the Establishment elite. (35)
To young people who want a revolution, I would
say this: You cannot be a revolutionary simply by letting
your hair grow and growing a beard. To be a real revolutionary
you must become involved in a real revolution - a revolution
in which you are pitted against everybody who has turned away
from God and his prepositional revelation to men, against
even the users of the God-words, a revolution in which we
may again hope to see good results, not only in individuals
going to heaven but in Christ who is Lord becoming Lord in
fact in this culture of ours to give us even in this fallen
world something of both truth and beauty. (36)
The key here is antithesis. If a statement
is true, its opposite is not true. We must take this very
seriously. (38)
If others do not see that, upon the basis
of what Christ has done, our Christian communities can stop
their bickering, their fighting and their in-fighting, then
we are not living properly. (39)
Chapter 3: The Church in a Dying Culture
Suppose we awoke tomorrow morning and we opened
our Bibles and found two things had been taken out, not as
liberals would take them out, but really out. Suppose God
had taken them out. The first item missing was the real empowering
of the Holy Spirit and the second item, the reality of prayer.
Consequently, following the dictates of Scripture, we would
begin to live on the basis of this new Bible in which there
was nothing about the power of the Holy Spirit and nothing
about the power of prayer. Let me ask you something: What
difference would there be from the way we acted yesterday?
Do we really believe God is there? If we do, we live differently.
(47)
There is no such thing as a Christian community
unless it is made up of individuals who are already Christians
who have come through the work of Christ. One can talk about
Christian community till one is green, but there will be no
Christian community except on the basis of a personal relationship
with the personal God through Christ. (54)
You can have individual Christians and no
Christian community, but you cannot have a Christian community
without having individual Christians. (55)
Chapter 7: Modern Man the Manipulator
People think they see reality when they see
those television pictures, but what they do not realize is
that they are looking at pure fantasy. They are looking at
an edited situation that does not present what is but what
the man at the console wants you to think is. You feel you
know everything because you have actually seen the picture
with your own eyes, but in every situation you have been given
a completely edited version. (96)
Chapter 8: Revolutionary Christianity
I have seen white evangelicals sit and clap
their heads off when black evangelicals get up to talk at
conference times. How they clap! That's nice because six years
ago the evangelicals would not have been clapping. But I want
to ask you something if you are white. In the past year, how
many blacks have you fed at your dinner table? How many blacks
have felt at home in your home? And if you haven't had any
blacks in your home, shut up about the blacks. On the basis
of Scripture, open your home to the blacks, and if they invite
you, go with joy into their homes. Have them feel at home
in your home. Then you will be able to begin to talk with
them and your church can jump across this division as it should,
but not before. And if you are a black Christian, it all cuts
equally the other way: How many whites have you invited to
your home in the last year? How many have eaten at your table?
How many times in the past year have you risked
having a drunk vomit on your carpeted floor? How in the world,
then, can you talk about compassion and about community -
about the church's job in the inner city? (107-108)
How many times have you had a drug-taker come
into your home? Sure it is a danger to your family, and you
must be careful. But have you ever risked it? If you don't
risk it, what are you talking about the drug problem for if
in the name of Christ you have not tried to help somebody
in this horrible situation! (108-109)
But Christian kids who come to L'Abri speaking
of the unreality they see among the evangelicals are not talking
about this kind of home. If they saw their parents opening
the door to the drug kids, to the kids with the long hair,
if they saw them opening their home at expense to their furniture
and rugs, if they were told to pray not merely for the lost
out there somewhere, but for specific people whom they knew
sitting at the table in their own home, the unreality could
be gone. (110)
Appendix II: The Mark of a Christian
The church is to be a loving church in a dying
culture. How, then, is the dying culture going to consider
us? Jesus says, "By this shall all men know that ye
are my disciples, if ye have love one to another."
In the midst of the world, in the midst of our present dying
culture, Jesus is giving a right to the world. Upon his authority
he gives the world the right to judge whether you and I are
born-again Christians on the basis of our observable love
toward all Christians.
That's pretty frightening. Jesus turns to
the world and says, "I've something to say to you. On
the basis of my authority, I give you a right: You may judge
whether or not an individual is Christian on the basis of
the love he shows to all Christians." In other words,
if people come up to us and cast in our teeth the judgment
that we are not Christians because we have not shown love
toward other Christians, we must understand that they are
only exercising a prerogative which Jesus gave them.
And we must not get angry. If people say,
"you don't love other Christians," we must go home,
get down on our knees and ask God whether or not they are
right. And if they are, then they have a right to have said
what they said. (136-137)
In John 13 the point was that, if an individual
Christian does not show love toward other true Christians,
the world has a right to judge that he is not a Christian.
Here Jesus is stating something else which is much more cutting,
much more profound: We cannot expect the world to believe
the Father sent the Son, that Jesus' claims are true, and
that Christianity is true, unless the world sees some reality
of the oneness of true Christians. (138-139)
The Christian is to exhibit that God exists
as the infinite-personal God; and then he is to exhibit simultaneously
God's character of holiness and love. Not his holiness without
his love: That is only harshness. Not his love without his
holiness: That is only compromise. (142)
A way we can show and exhibit love without
sharing in our brother's mistake is to approach the problem
with a desire to solve it, rather than with a desire to win.
(148)
|