Bill makes killing fetus separate
crime
Abortion activists say proposed law threatens right
to choose
Monday, February 23, 2004 Posted: 8:24 AM EST (1324
GMT)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Expanding rights for the unborn without
limiting mothers' reproductive rights is an issue that
confronts lawmakers this week when the House takes up
a bill that would make it separate federal crimes to
injure or kill both a woman and her fetus.
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act is
regarded by conservative groups as one of the most important
social policy measures that could come before Congress
this year.
"It's a step in the right direction,
toward recognizing the humanity of the unborn,"
said Genevieve Wood, spokeswoman for the Family Research
Council.
The National Right to Life Committee
cites polls showing that 80 percent of the public believes
there should be a law recognizing the killing of a fetus
as a homicide.
Opponents see the legislation as another
attempt, after last year's ban on a procedure that critics
call partial birth abortion, to curtail abortion rights.
The legislation would allow prosecutors
to charge a person with two murders for killing a woman
and her fetus, or with murder for an attack that kills
the fetus but the mother survives. The proposal would
apply only to federal crimes, such as terror attacks,
interstate stalking or cases that occur on military
bases or federal land.
The bill specifically precludes from
prosecution those who carry out legal abortions.
Matching state law
Already passed twice by the House, in 1999 and 2001,
the measure is expected to win approval again when it
comes up Wednesday or Thursday.
The Senate, with its stronger abortion
rights forces, effectively ignored the proposal in the
past. This time, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist,
R-Tennessee, has promised to take it up soon.
The bill, he told a group of conservatives recently,
"recognizes that when a criminal attacks a pregnant
woman and kills her unborn child, he has claimed not
just one but two precious human lives."
The bill's House sponsor, Rep. Melissa
Hart, R-Pennsylvania, said she is trying to bring federal
law in line with the 28 states that have laws covering
the unborn.
Abortion rights groups see it differently.
"We believe that it is a deceptive and callous
attempt to undermine the right to choose," said
Evelyn Becker, spokesman for NARAL Pro-Choice America.
The concern is that giving a zygote,
an embryo or a fetus the same rights as a person could
lead to future assaults on the Roe v. Wade court decision
affirming a woman's reproductive rights.
Certain forms of contraception could
be banned or an airline might refuse to sell a ticket
to pregnant women out of fear of being liable for a
miscarriage, abortion rights groups said.
Laci's law
Rita Smith, executive director of the Denver-based National
Coalition Against Domestic Violence, said her group
tried to work with lawmakers writing the legislation
to make it more about protecting women. "They wouldn't
go down that road. ... This seems to be more about trying
to undo abortion," she said.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-California, and
other opponents of Hart's bill favor a substitute that
would increase penalties for attacks that lead to the
interruption of a pregnancy but do not confer separate
legal rights to the fetus. That version is not expected
to prevail in the House.
Opponents said it would be the first
federal law to recognize a fetus at any stage of development
as an independent being. Hart argued that fetal rights,
such as inheritance rights, have plenty of precedent
in law.
The Bush administration, which supports
the unborn victims bill, took its own initiative on
fetal rights in 2002 when it ruled that "unborn
children" were eligible for health care from the
moment of conception under the State Children's Health
Insurance Program.
The legislation also is being called
Laci and Conner's Law, linking it to the highly publicized
death in late 2002 of Laci Peterson and her fetus, whose
body was found with plastic tape around its neck. Her
husband, Scott Peterson, is on trial for their murders
under California's unborn victims law
opponents are correct. this law is a step
towards recognizing the right of an unborn child to live
which is why we must support this initiative. pray our
government leaders would make the right choice. |