august
14, 2003
Mel Gibson's controversial 'Passion'
Hailed by some, condemned by others well before release
Monday, August 11, 2003 Posted: 10:51 AM EDT (1451 GMT)
excerpts from a cnn.com article
NEW YORK (AP) -- Those who have seen Mel Gibson's
film about the final hours of Jesus Christ have called it
beautiful, magical, a great and important work.
Those who fear "The Passion" could
fuel anti-Semitism, however, until now hadn't been allowed
to see the film. Seven months before its release, this extraordinary
vanity project is stirring passions over Gibson's exclusionary
screenings and the potential for a negative depiction of Jews.
On Friday it was shown in Houston to an audience
that included for the first time an official from the Anti-Defamation
League, which fights anti-Semitism. Audience members signed
confidentiality agreements before attending the screening.
"We still have grave concerns,"
Rabbi Eugene Korn, director of the ADL's Office of Interfaith
Affairs in New York, told the Houston Chronicle in Saturday's
editions.
Not just Jews are concerned -- the film was
first questioned by a nine-member panel that included Christians.
Gibson is a member of an ultraconservative Catholic movement
which rejects the Vatican's authority over the Catholic church.
Gibson has said the film is faithful to the
account of the crucifixion in the four Gospels and is meant
"to inspire, not offend."
The star of the blockbuster "Lethal Weapon"
movies and Oscar-winning director of "Braveheart"
has spent nearly $30 million of his own money to produce,
co-write and direct "The Passion," starring Jim
Caviezel as Jesus and Monica Bellucci as Mary Magdalene. Filmed
entirely in the dead languages of Aramaic and Latin, it has
yet to secure a distributor.
Trailers of the two-hour movie have turned
up on some Web sites. A 4 1/2-minute preview was shown Friday
for thousands of people attending a Christian festival at
Anaheim, California.
Ted Haggard, president of the National Evangelical
Association, saw a screening in late June with about 30 evangelical
scholars. The scholars are very strict about adherence to
scripture, so Gibson "had no assurances that we would
be friendly toward that movie."
But Haggard loved it. "I thought it was
the most authentic portrayal I've ever seen."
Cal Thomas, a conservative syndicated columnist,
called the film "the most beautiful, accurate, disturbing,
realistic and bloody depiction of this well-known story that
has ever been filmed."
Internet personality Matt Drudge told MSNBC:
"It depicts a clash between Jesus and those who crucified
him and speaking as a Jew, I thought it was a magical film
that showed the perils of life on earth."
Gibson said in a June statement that he and
his film are not anti-Semitic. "My intention in bringing
it to the screen is to create a lasting work of art and engender
serious thought among audiences of diverse faith backgrounds
(or none) who have varying familiarity with this story."
But what is Gibson's version of the story?
His traditionalist religion rejects the reforms of the Second
Vatican Council, which in 1965 rejected the notion that Jews
were collectively responsible for killing Jesus. The actor
is building a traditionalist church in Malibu, California,
for about 70 members, and intends to hold Sunday services
there in Latin.
"I don't know that he will be able to
find a studio that will distribute this," said Kim Masters,
a film columnist for Esquire Magazine.
Masters said industry people who have seen
the film respect its quality, but said it is disturbingly
graphic.
"It's not a family film, from what I
understand," she said. "It's a really difficult
film."
Movie
trailer link
|